Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente Prochaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
|
acupuncture:techniques instrumentales:04. aiguille-scalpel acupotomie [01 Jan 2024 18:08] Nguyen Johan [5.11. Gonarthrose] |
acupuncture:techniques instrumentales:04. aiguille-scalpel acupotomie [28 Aug 2025 19:20] (Version actuelle) Nguyen Johan [5.6. Névralgies cervico-brachiales] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 153: | Ligne 153: | ||
| ==== Névralgies cervico-brachiales ==== | ==== Névralgies cervico-brachiales ==== | ||
| + | * Choi HK, Lee SH, Lee JH, Choi S, Park S, Lim YS, Kim HJ, Kim YI, Park TY. Effectiveness of acupotomy combined with nerve block therapy for cervical radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 13;104(24):e42771. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000042771 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^Backgound| This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combining acupotomy with nerve block therapy (NBT) for cervical radiculopathy (CR) compared to NBT alone.| | ||
| + | ^Methods| A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the combined use of acupotomy and NBT for CR. Studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Data were synthesized through meta-analysis where applicable.| | ||
| + | ^Results|** Four RCTs with a total of 540 patients** were included. Meta-analysis showed that the combination of acupotomy and NBT significantly improved the total effective rate compared to NBT alone (risk ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.24, P < .0001). However, no significant pain reduction was observed based on the pain visual analog scale (SMD - 2.55, 95% confidence interval -5.32 to 0.22, P = .07), and there was substantial heterogeneity among the included studies (I² = 99%). The overall risk of bias was high, and safety data were limited, with only one study reporting adverse events.| | ||
| + | ^Conclusion| The findings suggest that acupotomy combined with NBT may enhance treatment effectiveness for CR, particularly in terms of overall therapeutic response. However, due to the high risk of bias, study heterogeneity, and insufficient safety reporting, further well-designed, large-scale RCTs with long-term follow-ups are needed to establish robust clinical evidence.| | ||
| Ligne 268: | Ligne 274: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * Zhang J, Pang T, Yao J, Li A, Dong L, Wang Y, Wang Y. Acupotomy therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 22;103(47):e39700. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039700 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^Backgound| This study aimed to evaluate the methodological quality, report quality, and evidence quality of a meta-analysis (MA) and systematic review (SR) of the efficacy of acupotomy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), and provided a reference for clinical decision-making.| | ||
| + | ^Methods| We searched 8 databases to collect systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the efficacy of acupotomy in the treatment of KOA from January 30, 2018, to January 31, 2023. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) 2 scale, the quality of the literature reports was scored using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systems Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 Version (PRISMA 2020),and the quality of the evidence was graded using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) scale.| | ||
| + | ^Results| **Nine systematic reviews** including 35 outcome indicators were included. AMSTAR 2 evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies, and 1 was of low quality, 8 were of very low quality, and the entries with poor scores were 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 12, and 13. By PRISMA 2020, there were some reporting deficiencies, and quality problems were mainly reflected in the abstract, information sources, search strategy, synthesis methods, reporting bias assessment, certainty assessment, reporting biases, certainly of evidence, registration and protocol. The GRADE classification results showed that there were 2 medium-quality evidences, 7 low-quality evidences, and 26 very low-quality evidences. The main factors of degradation were limitations, imprecision, and publication bias.| | ||
| + | ^Conclusion| Acupotomy had been a promising complementary treatment for KOA. However, due to the low quality of the SRs/MAs supporting these results, high-quality studies with rigorous study designs and larger samples were needed before widespread recommendations could be made. | | ||
