Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente Prochaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
|
acupuncture:evaluation:soins peri-operatoires:07. nausees et vomissements post-operatoires [04 Feb 2025 14:44] Nguyen Johan [3.3.3.1. Huang 2023] |
acupuncture:evaluation:soins peri-operatoires:07. nausees et vomissements post-operatoires [25 May 2025 11:26] (Version actuelle) Nguyen Johan |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 6: | Ligne 6: | ||
| ===== Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis===== | ===== Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis===== | ||
| - | | ☆☆☆ | Evidence for effectiveness and a specific effect of acupuncture | | + | |
| - | | ☆☆ | Evidence for effectiveness of acupuncture | | + | |
| - | | ☆ |Limited evidence for effectiveness of acupuncture | | + | |
| - | | Ø |No evidence or insufficient evidence | | + | |
| Ligne 225: | Ligne 222: | ||
| === Comparison of Acupuncture techniques === | === Comparison of Acupuncture techniques === | ||
| - | == Zhou 2024 == | + | == Zhou 2025 == |
| - | Zhou T, Hou H, Cairen Z, Wang Y, Wang P, Ge L, Wa M, Zhang S, Xu Z, Tang F, Wang C, Liu R, Li D, Xue J. Comparative effectiveness of acupoint stimulation for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia: A network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Surg. 2024 Sep 19. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001976 | + | Zhou T, Hou H, Cairen Z, Wang Y, Wang P, Ge L, Wa M, Xu Z, Tang F, Wang C, Liu R, Li D, Xue J, Zhang S. Comparative effectiveness of acupoint stimulation for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):1330-1347. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001976 |
| - | ^Objective| To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of different acupoint stimulation techniques in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after general anesthesia.| | + | ^Objective| The objective was to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of different acupoint stimulation techniques in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after general anesthesia.| |
| - | ^Methods| We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase for relevant papers, about the effect of acupoint stimulation for preventing PONV from their inception to July 31, 2023. Two reviewers performed study screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. We focused on patient important outcomes including the incidence of PONV, postoperative nausea (PON), or postoperative vomiting (POV), and the number of patients requiring antiemetic rescue. We conducted network meta-analyses to estimate the relative effectiveness between different acupoint stimulation using Stata 17.0 and Revman 5.3 software.| | + | ^Methods| The authors searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase for relevant papers, about the effect of acupoint stimulation for preventing PONV from their inception to 31 July 2023. Two reviewers performed study screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. The authors focused on patient important outcomes, including the incidence of PONV, postoperative nausea (PON), or postoperative vomiting (POV), and the number of patients requiring antiemetic rescue. The authors conducted network meta-analyses to estimate the relative effectiveness between different acupoint stimulation using Stata 17.0 and Revman 5.3 software.| |
| - | ^Results| We included **50 randomized trials involving 7,372 participants** (median age: 43.5 years, female: 73.3%). The network meta-analysis revealed that compared with the control (sham acupoint stimulation or blank control), antiemetic alone could significantly reduce the incidence of POV (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.69), but could not significantly reduce the incidence of PONV and PON (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.69; RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.10; respectively); both TEAS and electroacupuncture alone significantly reduced the incidence of PONV, PON, and POV, and combined with antiemetic was usually more effective than single acupoint stimulation.| | + | ^Results| The authors included **50 randomized trials** involving **7372 participants **(median age: 43.5 years, female: 73.3%). The network meta-analysis revealed that compared with the control (sham acupoint stimulation or blank control), antiemetic alone could significantly reduce the incidence of POV (RR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.36-0.69), but could not significantly reduce the incidence of PONV and PON (RR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.36-0.69; RR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.59-1.10; respectively); both TEAS and electroacupuncture alone significantly reduced the incidence of PONV, PON, and POV, and combined with antiemetic was usually more effective than single acupoint stimulation.| |
| ^Conclusions| Both TEAS and electroacupuncture, with or without antiemetic, could significantly reduce the incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia.| | ^Conclusions| Both TEAS and electroacupuncture, with or without antiemetic, could significantly reduce the incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia.| | ||
