Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente Prochaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
|
acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:19. algies plantaires et talagies [11 Jan 2022 18:23] Nguyen Johan |
acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:19. algies plantaires et talagies [25 Oct 2025 11:34] (Version actuelle) Nguyen Johan [1.2.1.1. Rao 2019] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 1: | Ligne 1: | ||
| + | /*Auteurs: Olivier Goret, Johan Nguyen, Claude Pernice*/ | ||
| /*English:Plantar Fasciitis / Heel Pain */ | /*English:Plantar Fasciitis / Heel Pain */ | ||
| ======= Plantar Fasciitis / Heel Pain ======= | ======= Plantar Fasciitis / Heel Pain ======= | ||
| - | ====== algies plantaires et talagies : évaluation de l'acupuncture ====== | + | ====== algies plantaires et talalgies : évaluation de l'acupuncture ====== |
| | Articles connexes : - [[acupuncture:conduites therapeutiques:rhumatologie:19. algies plantaires et talagies|conduites thérapeutiques]] - [[acupuncture:pathologies et zheng:rhumatologie:19. algies plantaires et talalgies|pathologie et zheng]] - | | | Articles connexes : - [[acupuncture:conduites therapeutiques:rhumatologie:19. algies plantaires et talagies|conduites thérapeutiques]] - [[acupuncture:pathologies et zheng:rhumatologie:19. algies plantaires et talalgies|pathologie et zheng]] - | | ||
| Ligne 9: | Ligne 10: | ||
| ===== Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis===== | ===== Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis===== | ||
| - | |☆☆☆ |Evidence for effectiveness and a specific effect of acupuncture. | | + | |
| - | |☆☆| Evidence for effectiveness of acupuncture.| | + | |
| - | | ☆ |Evidence for effectiveness of acupuncture mais limitées qualitativement et/ou quantitativement.| | + | |
| - | |Ø |No evidence or insufficient evidence.| | + | |
| ==== Generic Acupuncture ==== | ==== Generic Acupuncture ==== | ||
| + | === Asokumaran 2024 (Plantar Fasciitis, Network Meta-Analysis) === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Asokumaran I, Verasamy BS, Hasan MIB, Wong DKC, Ong SS, Ng SC. Comparative Effectiveness of Acupuncture Versus Non-surgical Modalities for Treating Plantar Fasciitis: A Network Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2024 Sep 8;16(9):e68959. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68959 | ||
| + | ^Background|Plantar fasciitis, or plantar heel pain, causes inflammation of the plantar fascia due to various causes, with no clear consensus on the treatment protocol. Standard first-line treatment includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physiotherapy. Second-line treatment prior to surgery includes extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), ultrasound-guided (USG) therapy, corticosteroid injection (CSI), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection. Recently, the use of acupuncture treatment has been gaining popularity, with increasing published evidence showing its effectiveness in treating plantar fasciitis.| | ||
| + | ^Objective and Methos| The objective of this study was to determine whether acupuncture intervention was a viable alternative treatment method for managing plantar fasciitis when compared to ESWT, USG therapy, CSI, and PRP injection. Data sources from PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Science Direct, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were reviewed. Clinical trials were searched from their inception over the period of January 2000 to October 2020. | | ||
| + | ^Results|A total of **32 relevant paper**s were included for analysis, totaling 2390 samples. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores measuring pain were analyzed in terms of outcome after one and three months of treatment. Each time point was analyzed separately through a network meta-analysis using the frequentist approach. VAS scores for each intervention at baseline and the two-time points (i.e., one and three months) were included in the comprehensive meta-analysis. Then, differences in VAS scores were calculated in R studio (V4.1.2; RStudio: Integrated Development for R, RStudio, Inc., Boston, USA) using the netmeta package. The netmeta package was also used to perform the network meta-analysis and generate corresponding figures. Direct and indirect effects were assessed and visualized through a direct evidence plot and a node-splitting forest plot. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs involving treatments of acupuncture, ESWT, USG therapy, CSI, or PRP injection, either in comparison with each other or with a placebo, were included in our review. Our meta-analysis showed that at one month, VAS scores for acupuncture treatment had the highest mean difference (MD) of -1.33 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = -2.19 to -0.46) compared to placebo, indicating that acupuncture treatment was more effective than other treatment arms when compared to placebo. Analysis at threemonths showed that the highest-ranked treatment was PRP injection, with an MD of -2.67 (95% CI = -6.23 to 0.89). However, the CI for the net effect of all treatments crossed the null effect on the forest plot, indicating no statistically significant difference between the treatment and placebo. | | ||
| + | ^Conclusions|Acupuncture treatment should be considered as a second-line treatment for treatment of plantar fasciitis together with other common treatment options such as ESWT, PRP injection, CSI, and USG therapy. Further long-term studies measuring acupuncture treatment outcomes would be beneficial in the future.| | ||
| Ligne 60: | Ligne 65: | ||
| === Acupotomy === | === Acupotomy === | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Li 2025 (+ fumigation) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Li C, Sun ZW, Ma JX, Gao X, Lou HJ, Li CY. The curative effect of traditional Chinese medicine fumigation combined with acupotomy in the treatment of heel pain: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 22;104(34):e43249. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000043249 | ||
| + | . | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^Background| To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effect of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) fumigation combined with acupotomy for treatment of heel pain.| | ||
| + | ^Methods| After a comprehensive search of large databases globally, a meta-analysis was performed on the results of randomized controlled trials conforming to the inclusion criteria using Review Manager 5.4 software, and the quality of the evidence rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation profiler 3.2.2 software.| | ||
| + | ^Results| A total of 1095 patients were included in 12 studies, with 548 in the treatment group and 547 in the control group. Heterogeneity test analysis showed no statistical heterogeneity among the 12 studies; therefore, a fixed-effects model combined with effect size analysis was used. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the clinical difference between the experimental and control groups was statistically significant. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system evidence grading showed that the evidence grade of TCM fumigation combined with acupotomy for heel pain was low.| | ||
| + | ^Conclusion| The curative effect of TCM fumigation combined with acupotomy in the treatment of heel pain was better than that of medicine alone. The evidence quality level of this conclusion was not high, and the research conclusion should be treated with caution and further confirmed using large samples and high-quality clinical trials.| | ||
| + | |||
| == Rao 2019 == | == Rao 2019 == | ||
| Ligne 98: | Ligne 115: | ||
| - | Li H, Lv H, Lin T. Comparison of efficacy of eight treatments for plantar fasciitis: A network meta-analysis. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(1):860-70. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:li-186261.pdf|[186261]}}. [[https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.26907|DOI]] | + | Li H, Lv H, Lin T. Comparison of efficacy of eight treatments for plantar fasciitis: A network meta-analysis. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(1):860-70. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:li-186261.pdf|[186261]}}. [[https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.26907|doi]] |
| Ligne 106: | Ligne 123: | ||
| ^Conclusions|According to the SUCRA, ESWT ranked the first as for all seven outcomes. ESWT might be the optimal treatment. In addition, BTX-A and PRP were considered as suboptimal| | ^Conclusions|According to the SUCRA, ESWT ranked the first as for all seven outcomes. ESWT might be the optimal treatment. In addition, BTX-A and PRP were considered as suboptimal| | ||
| + | == He 2017 == | ||
| + | He C, Ma H. Effectiveness of trigger point dry needling for plantar heel pain: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials. J Pain Res. 2017;10:1933-1942. [001]. [[https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s141607|doi]] | ||
| - | == Salvioli 2017 Ø== | ||
| + | ^Background|Plantar heel pain can be managed with dry needling of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs); however, whether MTrP needling is effective remains controversial. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of MTrP needling in patients with plantar heel pain.| | ||
| + | ^Materials and methods|PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed (Chinese BioMedical Literature Service System, People's Republic of China), and CNKI (National Knowledge Infrastructure, People's Republic of China) databases were systematically reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of MTrP needling. Pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CIs were calculated for change in visual analog scale (VAS) score, and pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs were calculated for success rate for pain and incidence of adverse events. A fixed-effects model or random-effects model was used to pool the estimates, depending on the heterogeneity among the included studies.| | ||
| + | ^Results|Extensive literature search yielded 1,941 articles, of which only seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that MTrP needling significantly reduced the VAS score (WMD =-15.50, 95% CI: -19.48, -11.53; P<0.001) compared with control, but it had a similar success rate for pain with control (risk ratio [RR] =1.15, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.51; P=0.320). Moreover, MTrP needling was associated with a similar incidence of adverse events with control (RR =1.89, 95% CI: 0.38, 9.39; P=0.438).| | ||
| + | ^Conclusion|MTrP needling effectively reduced the heel pain due to plantar fasciitis. However, considering the potential limitations in this study, more large-scale, adequately powered, good-quality placebo-controlled trials are needed to provide more trustworthy evidence in this area.| | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Salvioli 2017 Ø== | ||
| Ligne 172: | Ligne 196: | ||
| - | - **Trinh 2021**: Trinh K, Belski N, Zhou F, Kuhad A, Luk D, Youn E. The Efficacy of Acupuncture on Foot and Ankle for Pain Intensity, Functional Status, and General Quality of Life in Adults: A Systematic Review. Med Acupunct. 2021 Dec 1;33(6):386-395. [[https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2021.0006|doi]] | + | - **Trinh 2021**: Trinh K, Belski N, Zhou F, Kuhad A, Luk D, Youn E. The Efficacy of Acupuncture on Foot and Ankle for Pain Intensity, Functional Status, and General Quality of Life in Adults: A Systematic Review. Med Acupunct. 2021;33(6):386-395. [[https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2021.0006|doi]] |
| + | - **Llurda 2021** : Llurda-Almuzara L, Labata-Lezaun N, Meca-Rivera T, Navarro-Santana MJ, Cleland JA, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Pérez-Bellmunt A. Is Dry Needling Effective for the Management of Plantar Heel Pain or Plantar Fasciitis? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Med. 2021;22(7):1630-1641. [220671]. [[https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnab114|doi]] | ||
| + | - **Li 2019** : Li H, Lv H, Lin T. Comparison of efficacy of eight treatments for plantar fasciitis: A network meta-analysis. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(1):860-70. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:li-186261.pdf|[186261]}}. [[https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.26907|doi]] | ||
| + | - **Rao 2019**: Rao Y, Fang T, Liu FS, Zhou FY, Zhao MM, Chen M. [Meta-analysis of Therapy Comparison of Acupotomy Versus Block Therapy for Heel Pain]. Chinese Journal of Basic Medicine in TCM. 2019;25(9):1280. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:zhou-202950.pdf|[202950]}}. | ||
| - **Thiagarajah 2017**: Thiagarajah AG. How effective is acupuncture for reducing pain due to plantar fasciitis? Singapore Med J. 2017. 58(2):92-7. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:thiagarajah-188401.pdf|[188401]}}. | - **Thiagarajah 2017**: Thiagarajah AG. How effective is acupuncture for reducing pain due to plantar fasciitis? Singapore Med J. 2017. 58(2):92-7. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:thiagarajah-188401.pdf|[188401]}}. | ||
| - ** Clark 2012**: Clark RJ, Tighe M. The effectiveness of acupuncture for plantar heel pain: a systematic review. Acupunct Med. 2012 30(4):298-306.{{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:clark-157556.pdf|[157556]}} | - ** Clark 2012**: Clark RJ, Tighe M. The effectiveness of acupuncture for plantar heel pain: a systematic review. Acupunct Med. 2012 30(4):298-306.{{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:clark-157556.pdf|[157556]}} | ||
| + | |||
| ==== List ==== | ==== List ==== | ||
| Ligne 180: | Ligne 208: | ||
| ^ ^ Références |^ Sources ^ | ^ ^ Références |^ Sources ^ | ||
| - | | |||| | + | | || |
| - | ^ 2012 | Kumnerddee W, Pattapong N. Efficacy of electro-acupuncture in chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Chin Med 2012; 40:1167-76. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:kumnerdee-157866.pdf|[157865].}} || Thiagarajah 2016 | | + | ^ 2021 | Wang W, Liu Y, Jiao R, Liu S, Zhao J, Liu Z. Comparison of electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture for patients with plantar heel pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Acupunct Med. 2021 ;39(4):272-282. doi: 10.1177/0964528420947739.|| |
| + | ^ 2020 | Ho LF, Guo Y, Ching JY-L, et al. Efficacy of electroacupuncture plus warm needling therapy for plantar heel pain: A randomised waitlist-controlled trial. Acupunct Med. 2020; 964528420946048. || Trinh 2021 | ||
| + | | | Bagcier F, Yilmaz N. The impact of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and dry needling combination on pain and functionality in the patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg 2020;59(4):689–93 || Llurda 2021 | | ||
| + | ^ 2019 | Uygur E, Aktas¸ B, Eceviz E, Yilmazoglu EG, Poyanli O. Preliminary report on the role of dry needling versus corticosteroid injection, an effective treatment method for plantar fasciitis: A randomized controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Surg 2019;58 (2):301–5. 22. || Llurda 2021 | | ||
| + | ^ 2018| Rastegar S, Baradaran Mahdavi S, Hoseinzadeh B, Badiei S. Comparison of dry needling and steroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: A single-blind randomized clinical trial. Int Orthop 2018;42(1):109–16. || Llurda 2021 | | ||
| + | | | Rahbar M, Eslamian F, Toopchizadeh V, et al. A comparison of the efficacy of dry-needling and extracorporeal shockwave 1640 therapy for plantar fasciitis: A randomized clinical trial. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2018:e68908. || Llurda 2021 | | ||
| + | ^ 2016 | Wang L, Guo J, Lin F, et al. Efficacy of warm needling plus Chinese Herb Fumigation in chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. Modern J Integr Trad Chin West Med. 2016;25:416–417. || He 2017 | | ||
| + | | | Eftekharsadat B, Babaei-Ghazani A, Zeinolabedinzadeh V. Dry needling in patients with chronic heel pain due to plantar fasciitis: A single-blinded randomized clinical trial. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2016;30(1):401. ||He 2017, Li 2019, Llurda 2021 | | ||
| + | ^ 2015 | Qian S, Chen L. Efficacy of warm needling plus Chinese Herb Fumigation in patients with chronic heel pain due to plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. Shanghai J Acu Mox. 2015;34: 362–363.|| He 2017 | | ||
| + | | | Cai YM, Zhang JF, Huang WY. [Therapeutic Observation of Grain-sized Moxibustion plus Acupuncture for Plantar Fasciitis]. Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion. 2015;34(11):1111. [187580]. || | ||
| + | ^ 2014 | Li S, Shen T, Liang Y, Zhang Y, Bai B. Miniscalpel-needle versus steroid injection for plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:164714. || He 2017 | | ||
| + | | | Cotchett MP, Munteanu SE, Landorf KB. Effectiveness of trigger point dry needling for plantar heel pain: A randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2014;94(8):1083–1094. || He 2017, Li 2019, Trinh 2021, Llurda 2021 | | ||
| + | ^ 2012 | Kumnerddee W, Pattapong N. Efficacy of electro-acupuncture in chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Chin Med 2012; 40:1167-76. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:kumnerdee-157866.pdf|[157865].}} || Thiagarajah 2016, He 2017, Al-Boloushi 2019 | | ||
| ^ 2011 | Karagounis P, Tsironi M, Prionas G, Tsiganos G, Baltopoulos P. Treatment of plantar fasciitis in recreational athletes: two different therapeutic protocols. Foot Ankle Spec 2011; 4:226-34.{{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:karagounis-145311.pdf| [145311]}} || Thiagarajah 2016, Clark 2012 | | ^ 2011 | Karagounis P, Tsironi M, Prionas G, Tsiganos G, Baltopoulos P. Treatment of plantar fasciitis in recreational athletes: two different therapeutic protocols. Foot Ankle Spec 2011; 4:226-34.{{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:karagounis-145311.pdf| [145311]}} || Thiagarajah 2016, Clark 2012 | | ||
| - | | | Zhang SP, Yip TP, Li QS. Acupuncture treatment for plantar fasciitis: a randomised controlled trial with six months follow up. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011; 2011. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:zhang-28888.pdf|[28888].}} || Thiagarajah 2016, Clark 2012 | | + | | | Zhang SP, Yip TP, Li QS. Acupuncture treatment for plantar fasciitis: a randomised controlled trial with six months follow up. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011; 2011. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:zhang-28888.pdf|[28888].}} || Clark 2012, Thiagarajah 2016, He 2017, Al-Boloushi 2019, | |
| ^ 2010 | Liu MY, Nie RR, Chi ZH, Tang XM. [Observation on Therapeutic Effect of Acupuncture at Xuanzhong (GB 39) Combined with Chinese Herbs Pyrogenic Dressing Therapy for Treatment of Calcaneus Spur]. Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion. 2010;30(3):189-91. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:liu-155724.pdf|[155724].}} || Clark 2012 | | ^ 2010 | Liu MY, Nie RR, Chi ZH, Tang XM. [Observation on Therapeutic Effect of Acupuncture at Xuanzhong (GB 39) Combined with Chinese Herbs Pyrogenic Dressing Therapy for Treatment of Calcaneus Spur]. Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion. 2010;30(3):189-91. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:liu-155724.pdf|[155724].}} || Clark 2012 | | ||
| | | Orellana Molina A, Hernández Díaz A, Larrea Cox PJ, et al. Láser infrarrojo frente a acupuntura en el tratamiento del espolón calcáneo. Revista de la Sociedad Espana del Dolor 2010;17:69–77. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:orellana-165517.pdf|[165217]}} || Clark 2012 | | | | Orellana Molina A, Hernández Díaz A, Larrea Cox PJ, et al. Láser infrarrojo frente a acupuntura en el tratamiento del espolón calcáneo. Revista de la Sociedad Espana del Dolor 2010;17:69–77. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:orellana-165517.pdf|[165217]}} || Clark 2012 | | ||
| Ligne 197: | Ligne 237: | ||
| + | |||
| + | */ | ||
