Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente Prochaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
|
acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:12. cervicalgies aigues [10 Nov 2018 07:52] Nguyen Johan |
acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:12. cervicalgies aigues [23 Oct 2025 08:03] (Version actuelle) Nguyen Johan |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 1: | Ligne 1: | ||
| + | /*English:Acute Neck Pain*/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ======= Acute Neck Pain ======= | ||
| + | |||
| ====== Cervicalgies aiguës : évaluation de l'acupuncture ====== | ====== Cervicalgies aiguës : évaluation de l'acupuncture ====== | ||
| |Articles connexes : - [[acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:12. cervicalgies|cervicalgies]] - | | |Articles connexes : - [[acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:12. cervicalgies|cervicalgies]] - | | ||
| - | ===== Revues systématiques et méta-analyses ===== | + | ===== Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis===== |
| - | ==== acupuncture générique ==== | + | === Generic Acupuncture ==== |
| - | === Wong 2016 Ø === | ||
| - | Wong JJ, Shearer HM, Mior S, Jacobs C, Côté P, Randhawa K, Yu H, Southerst D, Varatharajan S, Sutton D, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Ameis A, Ammendolia C. Are manual therapies, passive physical modalities, or acupuncture effective for the management of patients with whiplash-associated disorders or neck pain and associated disorders? Spine J.2016;16(12):1598-1630. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:wong-195650.pdf|[195650]}} . | ||
| - | ^ Purpose | This review aimed to update the findings of the Neck Pain Task Force, which examined the effectiveness of manual therapies, passive physical modalities, and acupuncture for the management of WAD or NAD.STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. SAMPLE: The sample includes randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies comparing manual therapies, passive physical modalities, or acupuncture with other interventions, placebo or sham, or no intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were self-rated or functional recovery, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, psychological outcomes, or adverse events.| | ||
| - | ^ Methods | We systematically searched five databases from 2000 to 2014. Random pairs of independent reviewers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Studies with a low risk of bias were stratified by the intervention's stage of development (exploratory vs. Evaluation) and synthesized following best evidence synthesis principles. Funding was provided by the Ministry of Finance. | | ||
| - | ^ Results | We screened 8,551 citations, and 38 studies were relevant and 22 had a low risk of bias. Evidence from seven exploratory studies suggests that (1) for recent but not persistent NAD grades I-II, thoracic manipulation offers short-term benefits; (2) for persistent NAD grades I-II, technical parameters of cervical mobilization (eg, direction or site of manual contact) do not impact outcomes, whereas one session of cervical manipulation is similar to Kinesio Taping; and (3) for NAD grades I-II, strain-counterstrain treatment is no better than placebo. Evidence from 15 evaluation studies suggests that (1) for recent NAD grades I-II, cervical and thoracic manipulation provides no additional benefit to high-dose supervised exercises, and Swedish or clinical massage adds benefit to self-care advice; (2) for persistent NAD grades I-II, home-based cupping massage has similar outcomes to home-based muscle relaxation, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) does not offer benefits, **Western acupuncture provides similar outcomes to non-penetrating placebo electroacupuncture, and needle acupuncture provides similar outcomes to sham-penetrating acupuncture**; (3) for WAD grades I-II, needle electroacupuncture offers similar outcomes as simulated electroacupuncture; and (4) for recent NAD grades III, a semi-rigid cervical collar with rest and graded strengthening exercises lead to similar outcomes, and LLLT does not offer benefits. | | ||
| - | ^ Conclusion | Our review adds new evidence to the Neck Pain Task Force and suggests that mobilization, manipulation, and clinical massage are effective interventions for the management of neck pain. **It also suggests that electroacupuncture,** strain-counterstrain, relaxation massage, and some passive physical modalities (heat, cold, diathermy, hydrotherapy, and ultrasound) **are not effective** and should not be used to manage neck pain.| | ||
| - | === Moon 2014 ★ === | ||
| - | Moon TW, Posadzki P, Choi TY, Park TY, Kim HJ, Lee MS, Ernst E. Acupuncture for treating whiplash associated disorder: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:moon-001.pdf|[170692]}} | ||
| - | ^Purpose | The aim of this systematic reviewwas to determine the effectiveness of acupuncture for the treatment ofwhiplash associated disorder WAD). | | ||
| - | ^Methods | Twenty databases were searched fromtheir inceptions to Oct. 2013. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of acupuncture (AT), electroacupuncture (EA), or dry needling (DN) for the treatment of WAD were considered eligible. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. | | ||
| - | ^Results | **Six RCTs** met the inclusion criteria. Most of the included RCTs have serious methodological flaws. **Four of the RCTs showed effectiveness of AT, AT in addition to usual care (UC), AT in addition to herbal medicine (HM) or EA was more effective than relaxation, sham EA, sham EA in addition to HM or UC for conditioned painmodulation (CPM) and alleviating pain**. In one RCT, DN in addition to physiotherapy (PT) had no effect compared to sham-DN in addition to PT for the reduction of pain. None of the RCTs showed that AT/EA/DN was more effective than various types of control groups in reducing disability/function. One RCT did not report between-group comparisons of any outcome measures.| | ||
| - | ^Conclusion | **The evidence for the effectiveness of AT/EA/DN for the treatment of WAD is limited**. | | ||
| - | === Verhagen 2007 ∅ === | ||
| - | Verhagen AP, Scholten-Peeters GG, van Wijngaarden S, de Bie RA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Conservative treatments for whiplash. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;CD003338:. [185657]. | ||
| - | ^Background|Many treatments are available for whiplash patients but there is little scientific evidence for their accepted use. Patients with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) can be classified by the severity of signs and symptoms from Grade 0 (no complaints or physical signs) to Grade 4 (fracture or dislocation).| | ||
| - | ^Objectives|To assess the effectiveness of conservative treatment for patients with whiplash injuries rated as Grades 1 or 2 (neck and musculoskeletal complaints).| | ||
| - | ^Methods|Search Strategy: we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, 2006, Issue 3), MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PEDro to November 2006 and screened references of identified randomised trials and relevant systematic reviews. Selection Criteria: we selected randomised controlled trials published in English, French, German or Dutch, that included patients with a whiplash-injury, conservative interventions, outcomes of pain, global perceived effect or participation in daily activities. Data Collection And Analysis: two authors independently assessed the methodological quality using the Delphi criteria and extracted the data onto standardised data-extraction forms. We did not pool the results because of the heterogeneity of the population, intervention and outcomes and lack of data. A pre-planned stratified analysis was performed for three different comparisons. | | ||
| - | ^Main Results|Twenty-three studies (2344 participants) were included in this update, including nine new studies. A broad variety of conservative interventions were evaluated. Two studies included patients with chronic symptoms (longer than three months), two included subacute (four to six weeks) symptoms, two had undefined duration of symptoms, and 17 studied patients with acute (less than three weeks) symptoms. Only eight studies (33.3%) satisfied one of our criteria of high quality, indicating overall, a poor methodological quality. Interventions were divided into passive (such as rest, immobilisation, ultrasound, etc) and active interventions (such as exercises, act as usual approach, etc.) and were compared with no treatment, a placebo or each other. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity and lack of data precluded pooling. Individual studies demonstrated effectiveness of one treatment over another, but the comparisons were varied and results inconsistent. Therefore, the evidence neither supports nor refutes the effectiveness of either passive or active treatments to relieve the symptoms of WAD, Grades 1 or 2. | | ||
| - | ^Authors' Conclusions|The current literature is of poor methodological quality and is insufficiently homogeneous to allow the pooling of results. Therefore, clearly effective treatments are not supported at this time for the treatment of acute, subacute or chronic symptoms of whiplash-associated disorders.| | ||
| Ligne 39: | Ligne 25: | ||
| + | ===== Clinical Practice Guidelines ===== | ||
| + | | ⊕ positive recommendation (regardless of the level of evidence reported) \\ Ø negative recommendation (or lack of evidence) | | ||
| - | ===== Recommandation de bonne pratique ===== | ||
| + | ==== German Society of General Practice and Family Medicine (DEGAM, Germany) 2025 Ø ==== | ||
| - | | ⊕ recommandation positive (quel que soit le niveau de preuve annoncé) \\ Ø recommandation négative (ou absence de preuve) | | + | El-Allawy A, Hecht N, Luedtke K, Schleicher P, Weidner N, Kötter T. Clinical Practice Guideline: Nonspecific Neck Pain. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2025 Oct 3;122(20):552-557. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0119 |
| + | |Negative recommendations are issued for acupuncture for acute nonspecific neck pain (LoE V, GoR B)| | ||
| + | ==== Danish Health Authority (DHA, Denmark) 2016 ⊕ ==== | ||
| + | National clinical guideline for the non-surgical treatment of recent onset non-specific neck pain. Danish Health Authority. 2016. [206338]. [[https://www.sst.dk/-/media/Udgivelser/2016/NKR-nakkesmerter/EN_2017_268516---NKR-Nyopstaede-nakkesmerter-forside-quickguide.ashx?la=da&hash=79742E266F29C5EC9855EA737CFE99915921EF48|URL]]. | ||
| + | | Consider offering acupuncture treatment to patients with recent onset neck pain as an add-on to other treatment (= a weak/conditional recommendation for) | | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Ontario Protocol for Traffic InjuryManagement Collaboration ((OPTIMa, Canada) 2016 Ø ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Côté P, Wong JJ, Sutton D, et al. Management of neck pain and associated disorders: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(7):2000–2022. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4467-7. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:cote-001.pdf|[001]}}. [[https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4467-7|DOI]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |// Recommendation 4 For NAD grades I–II ≤ 3 months duration//,In view of evidence of no effectiveness, clinicians should not offer structured patient education alone, strain-counterstrain therapy, relaxation massage, cervical collar,** electroacupuncture**, electrotherapy, or clinic-based heat \\ //Recommendation 5 For NAD grades I–II ≥3 months duration//, In view of evidence of no effectiveness, clinicians should not offer strengthening exercises alone, strain-counterstrain therapy, relaxation massage, relaxation therapy for pain or disability, electrotherapy, shortwave diathermy, clinic-based heat, **electroacupuncture**, or botulinum toxin injections.| | ||
| ==== Colorado Division of Workers' Compensation (USA) 2014 ⊕ ==== | ==== Colorado Division of Workers' Compensation (USA) 2014 ⊕ ==== | ||
| Ligne 58: | Ligne 57: | ||
| Colorado Division of Workers' Compensation. Cervical spine injury medical treatment guidelines. Denver (CO): Colorado Division of Workers' Compensation. 2014; :96P. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:colorado-166325.pdf|[166325].}} | Colorado Division of Workers' Compensation. Cervical spine injury medical treatment guidelines. Denver (CO): Colorado Division of Workers' Compensation. 2014; :96P. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:colorado-166325.pdf|[166325].}} | ||
| | Acupuncture is recommended for chronic pain patients who are trying to increase function and/or decrease medication usage and have an expressed interest in this modality. It also may be beneficial for individuals experiencing acute or subacute neck pain who cannot tolerate nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). | | | Acupuncture is recommended for chronic pain patients who are trying to increase function and/or decrease medication usage and have an expressed interest in this modality. It also may be beneficial for individuals experiencing acute or subacute neck pain who cannot tolerate nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). | | ||
| + | |||
| Ligne 75: | Ligne 75: | ||
| - | | //Acute Cervicothoracic Pain.// Not recommended: Routine use of acupuncture (I) \\ //Subacute Cervicothoracic Pain.// Not recommended: Routine use of acupuncture (I) \\ //Chronic Cervicothoracic Pain.// Recommended: Acupuncture for select use in chronic cervicothoracic pain with or without radicular symptoms as an adjunct to facilitate more effective treatments (C) \\ //Radicular Pain Syndromes.// Not recommended: Routine use of acupuncture for acute radicular pain (I) | | + | | //Acute Cervicothoracic Pain.// Not recommended: Routine use of acupuncture (I) \\ //Subacute Cervicothoracic Pain.// Not recommended: Routine use of acupuncture (I) \\ | |
| Ligne 89: | Ligne 89: | ||
| Hardaker N, Ayson M. Pragmatic Evidence Based Review. The efficacy of acupuncture in the management of musculoskeletal pain. Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC, New-Zealand). 2011. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:hardaker-182414.pdf|[182414].}} | Hardaker N, Ayson M. Pragmatic Evidence Based Review. The efficacy of acupuncture in the management of musculoskeletal pain. Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC, New-Zealand). 2011. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:hardaker-182414.pdf|[182414].}} | ||
| - | | The evidence for the effectiveness of acupuncture is most convincing for the treatment of chronic neck and shoulder pain. In terms of other injuries, the evidence is either inconclusive or insufficient. The state of the evidence on the effectiveness of acupuncture is not dissimilar to other physical therapies such as physiotherapy, chiropractic and osteopathy. \\ // General // \\ - There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for the use of acupuncture in the management of acute neck, back or shoulder pain \\ - There is emerging evidence that acupuncture may enhance/facilitate other conventional therapies (including physiotherapy & exercise-based therapies) \\ - There is a paucity of research for the optimal dosage of acupuncture treatment for treating shoulder, knee, neck and lower back pain \\ - Studies comparing effective conservative treatments (including simple analgesics, physical therapy, exercise, heat & cold therapy) for (sub) acute and chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) have been largely inconclusive. \\ //Neck// \\ - There is good evidence that acupuncture is effective for short term pain relief in the treatment of chronic neck pain \\ - There is moderate evidence that real acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture for the treatment of chronic neck pain \\ - There is limited evidence that acupuncture has a long term effect on chronic neck pain | | + | | - There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for the use of acupuncture in the management of acute neck, back or shoulder pain. | |
| ==== National Health and Medical Research Council (Australie) 2003 Ø==== | ==== National Health and Medical Research Council (Australie) 2003 Ø==== | ||
| Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group. Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press Pty Ltd. 2003. 259P. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:australian-166495.pdf|[166495]. }} | Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group. Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press Pty Ltd. 2003. 259P. {{:medias securises:acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:australian-166495.pdf|[166495]. }} | ||
| - | |//Acute Neck Pain.// There are no randomised controlled studies on the effect of acupuncture or infrared acupuncture in the treatment of acute neck pain. There is conflicting evidence that acupuncture is more effective compared to placebo and other treatments for | + | |//Acute Neck Pain.// There are no randomised controlled studies on the effect of acupuncture or infrared acupuncture in the treatment of acute neck pain. There is conflicting evidence that acupuncture is more effective compared to placebo and other treatments for neck pain in mixed populations.| |
