Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

Lien vers cette vue comparative

Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente
acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:06. osteoporose [02 Feb 2025 14:55]
Nguyen Johan
acupuncture:evaluation:rhumatologie - orthopedie:06. osteoporose [28 Aug 2025 19:12] (Version actuelle)
Nguyen Johan [1.1.1. Ma 2025]
Ligne 12: Ligne 12:
  
 ==== Generic Acupuncture ==== ==== Generic Acupuncture ====
 +
 +=== Deng 2025 ===
 +
 +
 +Deng B, Xu T, Deng Z, Jiang Y, Li L, Liang W, Zhang Y, Wang H, Xu Y, Chen G. Efficacy of acupuncture-related therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis:​ a systematic review and network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 9;​12:​1483819. ​ https://​doi.org/​10.3389/​fmed.2025.1483819
 +^Introduction| To compare and analyze the clinical effects of acupuncture-related therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) and propose the optimal scheme, we utilized a network meta-analysis to evaluate the therapeutic effects of various commonly used acupuncture methods for PMOP.|
 +^Methods| Randomized controlled trials of acupuncture-related therapies for PMOP were searched in eight databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure,​ China Science and Technology Journal Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, and Wanfang database) from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2023. Our primary outcomes included overall clinical effectiveness rate, bone mineral density (BMD), and visual analog scale scores (VAS). The secondary outcome is adverse events. The entire process of literature screening and data analysis was conducted by 2 independent investigators.|
 +^Results| A total of **30 studies with 2,342 participants** provided data suitable for analysis. We compared six interventions:​ manual acupuncture,​ electroacupuncture,​ acupoint catgut embedding, moxibustion,​ acupoint application,​ and warm acupuncture. The results of the network meta-analysis revealed that, when compared to conventional Western medication (CWM), multiple acupuncture therapies had a greater impact on the overall clinical effectiveness rate. Electroacupuncture combined with CWM demonstrated superior clinical effectiveness and lumbar spine BMD improvement. Moxibustion with CWM ranked highest for femoral neck BMD, while warm acupuncture showed optimal effects on Ward's triangle and trochanter BMD. Acupoint catgut embedding provided the greatest pain reduction. The most prevalent minor adverse effects included hematoma, discomfort, and scorching.|
 +^Conclusion| The results suggest that several acupuncture-related therapies, either alone or in conjunction with CWM, outperform CWM alone and may be regarded as an alternative or supplementary therapy to PMOP, though higher-quality trials are needed.|
 +
 +
  
 === Ma 2025 === === Ma 2025 ===
Ligne 22: Ligne 33:
  
  
 +=== Teng 2025 ===
 +
 +Teng Z, Zhu J, Li K, Tong T, Li W, Chu H, Sun P. Efficacy and safety of acupuncture as an adjuvant therapy for osteoporosis:​ a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 9;​16:​1561344. ​ https://​doi.org/​10.3389/​fendo.2025.1561344
 +^Objective| To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture as an adjuvant therapy for osteoporosis (OP) through a comprehensive synthesis of recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence.|
 +^Methods| A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases (2014 - 2024) to identify RCTs investigating acupuncture combined with conventional therapy for OP. Study quality was appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.0, with subgroup analyses stratified by intervention type, population characteristics,​ and treatment duration.|
 +^Results| **28 RCTs (n=2,758)** were included. Meta-analysis revealed acupuncture significantly enhanced bone mineral density (BMD) versus controls: total (SMD = 0.47, p = 0.03), femoral neck (MD = 0.05, p = 0.01), lumbar spine (SMD = 0.40, p < 0.001), Ward's triangle (MD = 0.07, p = 0.02), and hip (SMD = 0.55, p < 0.001), with particularly marked improvements in the postmenopausal osteoporosis subgroup. Acupuncture demonstrated significant improvements in treatment efficacy, biochemical markers, pain scores, and symptom assessments,​ while reducing adverse events. Warm needle moxibustion outperformed controls in femoral neck (MD = 0.07, p = 0.002) and hip BMD (SMD = 0.87, p < 0.001), while electroacupuncture significantly elevated serum calcium (MD = 0.18, p = 0.02). Short-term interventions (≤ 3 months) demonstrated optimal efficacy.|
 +^Conclusion| Acupuncture demonstrates efficacy and safety as an OP adjuvant therapy. Current evidence is limited by regional bias and methodological heterogeneity. Multicenter,​ large-sample RCTs are needed to standardize protocols and validate long-term therapeutic efficacy.|
  
 === Pan 2018 ☆☆=== === Pan 2018 ☆☆===