Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente Prochaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
|
acupuncture:evaluation:pneumologie:05. cancer du poumon [29 Sep 2022 14:47] Nguyen Johan [1.1. Bian 2020 (Lung Cancer Pain) ☆] |
acupuncture:evaluation:pneumologie:05. cancer du poumon [24 Oct 2025 18:15] (Version actuelle) Nguyen Johan [1.1. Jia 2024 (lung cancer-related pain)] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 8: | Ligne 8: | ||
| ===== Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis===== | ===== Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis===== | ||
| - | | ☆☆☆ | Evidence for effectiveness and a specific effect of acupuncture | | + | |
| - | | ☆☆ | Evidence for effectiveness of acupuncture | | + | |
| - | | ☆ |Limited evidence for effectiveness of acupuncture | | + | |
| - | | Ø |No evidence or insufficient evidence | | + | === Almassi 2025 (Fatigue) === |
| + | |||
| + | Almassi AA, Tang CY, Smith S. Comparison of Single Versus Multiple Nonpharmacological Interventions for the Management of Lung Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Systematic Review. Clin Respir J. 2025 Oct;19(10):e70132. https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.70132 | ||
| + | . | ||
| + | ^Background|Lung cancer is one of the common cancers globally. One of the adverse symptoms of lung cancer and its treatment is fatigue. Pharmacological interventions have not shown efficacy on cancer-related fatigue, and investigations on nonpharmacological interventions may be useful. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions on managing fatigue and quality of life outcomes among people undergoing treatment for lung cancer and evaluate if treatment efficacy differed between single and multimodal interventions.| | ||
| + | ^Methods|Relevant literature published in MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and ProQuest from January 2003 to January 2023 was included. Included studies must have: participants over 16 years of age receiving treatment such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or surgery, cancer-related fatigue (CRF) as an outcome, and must be randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers independently extracted data from eligible articles, and data analysis was performed using R 4.1.0 software.| | ||
| + | ^Results|Total of 14 randomized controlled trials were included and categorized into four groups: physical activities, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), education, and dietary counselling. Our extensive search did not find any multimodal studies related to CRF in patients with lung cancer. Pooled results of this systematic review found that TCM and education interventions have a significant positive impact on fatigue in patients with lung cancer. Physical activity and dietary counselling were not effective in managing fatigue. None of the reported nonpharmacological interventions in this review significantly impact QoL.| | ||
| + | ^Conclusions|This review identified that TCM and educational programs improved CRF in patients with lung cancer. However, physical activities and dietary counselling did not show any improvements in fatigue for patients undergoing lung cancer treatment.| | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Jia 2024 (lung cancer-related pain) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Jia L, Wang K, Chen S. Acupuncture combined with opioid for treatment of lung cancer-related pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 18;103(42):e40158. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040158. | ||
| + | ^Backgound| Many individuals diagnosed with lung cancer suffer from tremendous pain, and it is crucial to implement more effective measures to assist these patients in alleviating their pain. The present study utilizes a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of acupuncture combined with opioids for treating lung cancer-related pain in patients.| | ||
| + | ^Methods| We have searched 8 electronic databases: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Database, and SinoMed. We included all randomized controlled trials of acupuncture combined with opioids for lung cancer-related pain in adults. We observed the main outcome indicators, including pain relief rates, numeric rating scale scores, and adverse events. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, literature data extraction, and assessment of bias risk in the literature quality. Any disagreements were resolved through discussions between the 2 researchers or consultations with a third researcher. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the revised risk of bias assessment tool. The overall quality of evidence for each outcome was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations.| | ||
| + | ^Results| We retrieved **812 lung cancer patients from 11 trials**. The study showed that compared to opioids alone, the combination of acupuncture and opioids significantly reduced numeric rating scale scores, increased pain relief rates, and decreased the occurrence of side effects.| | ||
| + | ^Conclusion| The current evidence indicates that combining acupuncture with opioid analgesics is superior to using opioid analgesics alone for managing lung cancer-related pain. Additionally, this combination therapy has fewer adverse reactions.| | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Wang 2023 ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Wang S, Mu C, Zhang F, Tang H, Ning W. Acupuncture or moxibustion adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 20;102(42):e35000. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035000 | ||
| + | ^Background| To compare the advantages and disadvantages of different acupuncture and moxibustion methods by network meta-analysis, in order to find out the best acupuncture and moxibustion adjuvant chemotherapy scheme of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).| | ||
| + | ^Methods| Randomized controlled trials of acupuncture and moxibustion adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP database and SinoMed. The retrieval time was up to December 03, 2022. ROB2 was used to evaluate publication bias, and Stata16 was used for network meta-analysis.| | ||
| + | ^Results| A total of **14 studies involving 921 patients** were included. The results of network Meta-analysis showed that the effect of acupuncture combined with chemotherapy was better than that of chemotherapy (RR = 1.28, 95%CI (1.04,1.58), P < .0001). The effect of acupuncture combined with chemotherapy was better than that of chemotherapy in improving KPS score (MD = 9.01, 95%CI (3.35,14.67), P < .0001). The safety of acupuncture combined with chemotherapy (RR = 0.35, 95%CI (0.15,0.83), P < .0001) was better than that of chemotherapy.| | ||
| + | ^Conclusion| Acupuncture combined with chemotherapy has the best comprehensive effect.| | ||
| ==== Xi 2022 ☆==== | ==== Xi 2022 ☆==== | ||
