Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente | |||
|
acupuncture:evaluation:gyneco-obstetrique:03. dysmenorrhees [05 May 2025 14:51] Nguyen Johan [1.2.3.1. Xu 2022] |
acupuncture:evaluation:gyneco-obstetrique:03. dysmenorrhees [29 Oct 2025 14:20] (Version actuelle) Nguyen Johan [1.2.6. Acupression] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 372: | Ligne 372: | ||
| === Acupression === | === Acupression === | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Yu 2025 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yu X, Liu B, Li J, Gao Y, Chen J, Qi R, Yuan Y, Liu Y. Efficacy and safety of acupressure for primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Med. 2025 Oct 23:103272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103272 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^Objective| This systematic review aimed to evaluate the existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for evidence of the association between using acupressure and reducing pain and related symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea (PD).| | ||
| + | ^Methods| Six electronic databases were searched for published reports on RCTs—from database inception until May 2025—that compared the use of acupressure with that of placebo acupressure, oral medication, or usual treatment and measured the intensity of menstrual pain and related symptoms. Two independent reviewers extracted and assessed the data. Risk of bias was assessed for each article; the meta-analysis was conducted according to the type of control. Results are presented as mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).| | ||
| + | ^Results| In total, **23 RCTs** were included in the systematic review and data from 20 RCTs were evaluated in the meta-analysis. Most studies showed a low or unclear risk of bias. We found that using acupressure was more effective in reducing menstrual pain than using placebo acupressure (MD = -1.58; 95% CI, [-1.96, -1.20]), oral medication (MD = -1.11; 95% CI, [-1.79, -0.43]), or usual treatment (MD = -1.29; 95% CI, [-1.77, -0.80]). The adverse events, reported in only two studies, were mild.| | ||
| + | ^Conclusion| Acupressure can effectively reduce the pain and related symptoms of PD, though the current evidence is of low quality. Future studies with rigorous designs and larger sample sizes are warranted to verify the efficacy and safety of acupressure. Subsequent findings should be incorporated into clinical practice and nursing care to refine the treatment strategies for PD.| | ||
| == Armour 2019 ☆== | == Armour 2019 ☆== | ||
